<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ozsource Australia &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ozsource.com.au/tag/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ozsource.com.au</link>
	<description>The Australian Alternative Media Source.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>iinet vs AFACT: Final Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozsource.com.au/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Cowdroy's final decision has been revealed today in the iiNet vs AFACT (Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft) case and has found that ""It is impossible to conclude that iiNet has authorised copyright infringement" and "iiNet did not have relevant power to prevent infringements occurring,"
Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

