<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ozsource Australia &#187; AFACT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ozsource.com.au/tag/afact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ozsource.com.au</link>
	<description>The Australian Alternative Media Source.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>AFACT hindrance not beneficial: iiNet</title>
		<link>http://www.ozsource.com.au/source/afact-hindrance-not-beneficial-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozsource.com.au/source/afact-hindrance-not-beneficial-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetch TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozsource.com.au/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have been following the iiNet vs AFACT case, this latest press release may be of interest.  iiNet have put into perspective the current situation in regards to how AFACT continues to defend its archaic accusations by using political channels rather than work with the internet industry in order to create a practical solution.
Clearly, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozsource.com.au/source/afact-hindrance-not-beneficial-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iinet vs AFACT: Final Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torrents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozsource.com.au/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Cowdroy's final decision has been revealed today in the iiNet vs AFACT (Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft) case and has found that ""It is impossible to conclude that iiNet has authorised copyright infringement" and "iiNet did not have relevant power to prevent infringements occurring,"
Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozsource.com.au/entertainment/tv/iinet-vs-afact-final-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

